Idaho Dems say socialist agenda won’t work

Print Article

Former Idaho Democratic congressmen Walt Minnick, Larry LaRocco and Richard Stallings are not on the front lines of this presidential campaign. But they have better thoughts about what it will take for a Democrat to win the White House than most of the candidates running.

The objective should be this: Nominate a candidate who can defeat President Trump. And, they say, democratic socialism (Medicare for all and free college education for all) and proposals such as the “Green New Deal” are not the answers.

“Democratic socialism is a prescription for defeat,” Minnick says bluntly. And he’s correct.

Here’s some other words of wisdom: Take a hike, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and take Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) and Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) with you. All three Idaho Democrats think Sanders, especially, would be a disaster as the party’s nominee.

“That would be the easiest way to re-elect Trump,” LaRocco said. “Sanders comes across as a cranky old guy who does not have solid proposals that can be paid for.”

Candidates may be appealing to their base with their “progressive” rhetoric, but the only way they get their agenda through is if Democrats maintain control of the House and gain more than a two-thirds majority in the Senate. The lowly Detroit Tigers have a better chance of going to the World Series than the Senate having that sort of an overhaul.

“The Democratic Party in Idaho has gone more to the left, but I’ve always been more in the middle lane and that’s where I’m going to stay, because I think that’s the winning strategy,” LaRocco says. “We should talk about the various issues, but I favor a more reasoned approach, such as extending Obamacare or expanding Medicare. But the radical ideas, such as upending the private insurance market, is just not going to fly.”

He makes a good point. Democratic voters, alone, cannot win the White House. At the moment, most of the candidates are doing nothing to sway Republicans (even those who dislike Trump) and they’re running independents off the cliff with their far-left agenda.

It doesn’t need to be this way, LaRocco says. Defeating Trump is doable.

“We have a strong economy and he can’t get out of the low 40s in polling. It shows that people are looking for a change. He’ll continue to have his rallies and play to his base, but that didn’t work so well for him in the mid-term elections,” LaRocco said. “We have to stop this Trump train because it’s not taking us in the right places nationally and internationally. I’m disgusted by this administration and its continued lies and distortions and playing to people’s fears.”

So, who’s the candidate that can win? Stallings, for now, is backing former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I know Joe well, and we worked together on a number of projects,” Stallings said. “He’s a straight shooter and an honest guy. His agenda is pure and, at this point, I’m supporting him. Does that mean I will be there in the end? I don’t know. I’d like to see somebody younger, but I’ll have to see how others perform.”

LaRocco says he has contributed to Biden, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee.

“I’m attracted to Mayor Pete’s style and ability to go after Trump, and define Trump,” LaRocco said.

Minnick thinks Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a former colleague in Congress, is worthy of consideration – and the kind of centrist candidate that would give Democrats a better chance to win in 2020.

“He’s focused on the big issue for our generation, climate change, and a brings a sensible, moderate and pragmatic approach,” Minnick said. “I served with him in Congress, and he is not highly partisan. I want a president who can work beyond party lines who can represent all Americans, which is the principal defect of the current president who I have very little respect for.”

Minnick acknowledges that Inslee is a longshot, but so were former Presidents Jimmy Carter (1976) and Bill Clinton (1992) at the early stages of their campaigns. “They were little-known governors of not-too-consequential southern states, and they went on to win it all,” Minnick noted.

It’s too early to guess how far Inslee will go, or even if he’ll be invited to the next debate. But Minnick has it right; a lot of developments can – and will – happen before the first primaries next year.

Chuck Malloy, a long-time Idaho journalist, is a columnist with Idaho Politics Weekly. He may be reached at ctmalloy@outlook.com

Print Article

Read More Columns

BOOK REVIEW: AMERICAN COPPER by Shann Ray (fiction, 2015)

October 21, 2019 at 11:50 am | Shoshone News-Press This is a story set in the Montana copper mining country around Butte. It has little to do with the mining industry but focuses on several people involved in it. Josef Lowry, “the Baron”, is a p...

Comments

Read More

Risch speaks no evil of President Trump

October 21, 2019 at 11:47 am | Shoshone News-Press Sen. Jim Risch of Idaho, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is accustomed to getting questions from the media. But there are a couple of ground rules that he is exercising these days....

Comments

Read More

Impeachment talk rages; other work stalls

October 07, 2019 at 10:50 am | Shoshone News-Press In Washington politics, the shrill voices are the ones who tend to get heard, but it’s those who are trying to stay above the fray – such as Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo – who are trying to deal with some...

Comments

Read More

Risch to Idahoans: Read transcript, then decide

September 30, 2019 at 10:52 am | Shoshone News-Press Idaho Sen. Jim Risch chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and is the No. 2 figure on the Select Intelligence Committee, which means he has access to President Trump – and lots of clout to ...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 752-1120
620 E Mullan Ave.
P.O. Box 589
Osburn, Idaho 83849

©2019 Shoshone News Press Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X